Legal Opinion

Balboni v. Stonick

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 11, 1984No. 2454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dannehy, C.P.J.

This is an action for damages resulting from injuries sustained by the plaintiff in an automobile collision between his automobile and an automobile driven by the defendant. The intersection where the collision took place was governed by a traffic signal light which both opposing parties contended was green in their favor. After trial, the jury returned a general verdict for the defendant, but the trial court granted a motion to set it aside, from which action this appeal was taken.1

There appears to have been no substantial dispute as to certain circumstances preliminary to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  2. State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Piantedosi v. FloridiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Herb v. KerrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Esposito v. WetheredConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Patrick v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Amendola v. GeremiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Zimny v. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API