Amendola v. Geremia
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiffs, Brett Amendola and his father, Ralph Amendola, appeal from the judgment ren*36dered by the trial court for the defendant Keith Goclowski after the granting of Goclowski’s motion for summary judgment and the denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs claim that the court erred (1) in concluding as a matter of law that Goclowski’s actions were not negligent and in failing to conclude as a matter of law that his actions were negligent, and (2) in concluding that the actions of the codefendants constituted superseding causes relieving Goclowski of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Spencer v. Good Earth Restaurant CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Dougherty v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- O'Brikis v. Supermarkets General Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Belton v. DragoiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Amendola v. GeremiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.