Legal Opinion
Clark v. Southern Kraft Corporation
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1940No. 6231PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
This action is ex delicto in nature and is brought by plaintiff against his former employer, Southern Kraft Corporation. He claims damages under Article 2315 of the Revised Civil Code of Louisiana for injuries and attending disability which, as he alleges, had their incipiency as a result of and while he was engaged in his employment with said defendant. No demand for compensation under the Louisiana Employers’ Liability Act is included in the suit.
For a cause of action, the following averments are made in the petition:
“That your petitioner has, for more than the past six (6)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyer v. Crescent Paper Box Factory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Eames v. Alexandria Contracting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Jackson v. Southern Kraft CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atchison v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Pershing Quicksilver Co. v. ThiersNevada Supreme Court · 1944
- Hawkins v. Employers Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Samson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.