Legal Opinion

Pershing Quicksilver Co. v. Thiers

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1944No. 3397PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Orr, C. J.:

Respondent was awarded a judgment in the trial court for an injury from mercurial poisoning, alleged to have been contracted while employed by appellant, as the result of the negligence of the appellant in failing to furnish respondent a safe place to work.

After inactivity in their mine and mill for a period of some eleven years, the Pershing Quicksilver Company resumed operations, and during the course of those operations, to-wit: on or about the 14th of January 1942 the said Pershing Quicksilver Company employed Henry I. Thiers, the respondent, to work in its…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Clark v. M. W. Leahy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prescott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
  2. Nevada Industrial Commission v. PeckNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Aranbula v. Banner Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Frith v. Harrah South Shore Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Provenzano v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API