Legal Opinion

Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 25, 1998No. 98-1010PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

This case demonstrates the high costs Massachusetts imposes on businesses which engage in unfair or deceptive trade practices prohibited by Mass. Gen. Laws eh. 93A. The legal question raised here, one of first impression for this court, is whether when one business engages in unfair and deceptive practices towards another and the harm consists of a delay in payments owed (and the usual accompanying expenses), that is a “loss of money or property” establishing a violation under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A, § 11. The high costs imposed are that the damages awarded are not those…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc., Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Karen Romano v. U-Haul International, U-Haul Company of Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Smith v. Dorchester Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. In Re Pharm. Industry Average Wholesale Price Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API