Legal Opinion
Arthur D. Little International, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 13, 1998No. Civil Action 94-11875-PBSPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This order assessing attorneys’ fees and costs comes at the end of the trial court phase of protracted and expensive litigation between two sophisticated corporations disputing a bill for consulting services involving a billion dollar aluminum smelter project in Venezuela that was never built.
On October 25, 1996, a jury awarded the plaintiff consulting firm, Arthur D. Little International, Inc. (“ADL”), $460,000.00 on a claim of breach of contract and rejected all of the contractual defenses and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Clamp-All Corp. v. ForestaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- System Management, Inc. v. LoiselleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Incase, Inc. v. Timex Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.