Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
Cases involving less than two of the exceptions to the general rule that “the employer of an independent contractor is not liable for physical harm caused to another by an *281act or omission of the contractor or his servants,” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 409 (1965), are, in the words of Dean Prosser, “comparatively rare.”1 By Dean Prosser’s standard, this is not a rare case.
I. Background
United States Steel Corporation hired an independent contractor, Edward Gray Corporation, to “tear out” deteriorating bricks inside the Number 4 blast furnace at U.S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Cephas E. Sword and Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Intervener v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Schwartz v. WhelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gene & Harvey Builders, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- City of Philadelphia v. Stepan Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.