Legal Opinion

Wolbach v. Village of Flossmoor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1946No. Gen. No. 43,773PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neemeyer

Plaintiff, the owner of a tract of land of approximately 80 acres used solely for agricultural purposes, filed his petition under the Revised Cities and Village Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 24, § 7-42 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 21.1233]) for the disconnection of his land from the Village of Flossmoor. Judgment having been entered in his favor, defendant appeals.

The statute authorizes disconnection of a tract which (1) is not contiguous in whole or in part to any other municipality; (2) contains 20 or more acres; (3) is not subdivided into municipal lots and blocks; (4) is located on the border…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Punke v. Village of ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wild v. People ex rel. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Furlong v. South Park Commissioners.Illinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Holston Salt & Plaster Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  5. Coy v. CoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Barrington HillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Woodward Governor Co. v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Museum Development Corp. v. Wheeling Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Metropolitan Sanitary District v. City of Palos HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API