Legal Opinion

Furlong v. South Park Commissioners.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1926No. 16786. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Appellant, a tax-payer, filed a bill in the superior court of Cook county to enjoin the South Park Commissioners, defendant, from letting any contract, issuing or selling bonds or expending public money for reconstruction of the Fine Arts Building so as to provide a convention hall, school of industrial arts or women’s memorial building; also from issuing or selling bonds to pay for reconstruction of said building so as to make it suitable for an industrial museum or museum of architecture and sculpture, and from issuing or selling bonds to pay for the restoration of the exterior of said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Spires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Gibbons v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pettibone v. West Chicago Park CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Graham v. DyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lewis v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Plano v. Homoky, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Fairbank v. StrattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. King v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. People Ex Rel. Sweitzer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API