Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARROW, Chief Judge.
On February 22, 1974, the plaintiff instituted the subject action in this Court seeking to quiet title to real property situated in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, to cancel a deed thereto given by her under date of December 3, 1965, to cancel all instruments of conveyance and encumbrance executed and recorded since her deed of December 3, 1965, and for ejectment of the defendants in possession of the subject real property. The plaintiff predicated her right to the relief sought upon the Act of Congress of August 4, 1947, 61 Stat. 731,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Scott v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re Scott)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
- Knox v. Milwaukee County Board of Elections CommissionersDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.