Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hilburn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Rose Hilburn (appellant) appeals the judgment of sentence entered on June 25, 1998. We affirm.

¶ 2 On October 29, 1996, appellant presented two prescriptions for controlled substances to pharmacist Dale McFarland at John’s Pocono Mountain Pharmacy. Mr. McFarland was suspicious and notified appellant that he intended to check their authenticity. Appellant left the store while Mr. McFarland was on the telephone. Subsequent investigation revealed that the signatures were in fact forged, and appellant was charged with forgery and attempted acquisition of a controlled substance by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. BaskervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MorningwakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. CraddockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Com. v. Calipo, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Flores, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Rolland, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Styles, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API