Commonwealth v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
James Wilson (Appellant) appeals from the Order of the Superior Court, which reinstated his convictions and remanded for sentencing. We granted allocatur to decide whether the trial in absentia violated Appellant’s constitutional rights. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Superior Court’s Order and hold that when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from the trial proceedings without cause, he has waived his right to be present and it is within the trial court’s discretion to continue without delay.
FACTS
The Philadelphia Police executed a search warrant for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Falk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Commonwealth v. SullensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MallorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MichaudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FloresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FaulkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.