Legal Opinion
Litchfield Park Service Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 21, 1994No. 1 CA-CC 92-0004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Litchfield Park Service Company (“LPSCO”) appeals from an order of the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) which allowed only a portion of its requested rate increase for utility services. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the order of the Commission.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
LPSCO, a subsidiary of SunCor Development Company, whose parent company is Pinnacle West, is an Arizona corporation authorized to provide water and sanitary sewer services. On May 13, 1991, LPSCO filed with the Commission an application seeking permanent increases in its water and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forum Development, L.C. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Freeport Minerals Corp. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Turner Ranches Water & Sanitation Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Aps v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.