Legal Opinion
Pugh v. Goord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 2002No. 00 Civ. 7279(GEL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Thomas Pugh, Jr., Errol En-nis, Edward Hamil and Clay Chatin bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pro se, alleging that the defendants, several senior administrators in the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) and the Fishkill Correctional Facility (“Fishkill”), violated plaintiffs’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons that follow the motion is denied and the case will be dismissed.
Background
Plaintiffs are inmates…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mujahid Farid v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent of the Attica Correctional Facility, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pugh v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Cancel v. MazzucaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Pugh v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Pugh v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Nitke v. AshcroftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003