Legal Opinion
Nitke v. Ashcroft
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 24, 2003No. 01 CIV. 11476(RMB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs Barbara Nitke, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (“Coalition”), and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom Foundation (“Foundation”) bring this action to enjoin enforcement of the obscenity provisions of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), Section 502 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(B). Pursuant to Section 561 of that Act, id. § 223 note, and 28 U.S.C. § 2284, a three-judge district court has been empaneled to hear the case.
Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the CDA, and the…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Black Lives Matter v. Town of ClarkstownDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- NICHOLS MEDIA GROUP, LLC. v. Town of BabylonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Nitke v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Griffith v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.