Legal Opinion

Estate of Ross

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1919No. S. F. No. 8776PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment of court upon verdict of a jury in favor of proponents in a contest of the will of Isaac J. Ross, deceased.

There was a former appeal, in which this court reversed a judgment entered after the sustaining of a motion for nonsuit. (Estate of Ross, 173 Cal. 178, [159 P. 603].) At the second trial the contestants introduced virtually the same testimony as that produced upon the previous hearing, and, as a summary thereof was given by Mr. Justice Henshaw in the opinion which appears in the one hundred seventy-third volume of the California Reports, we refer to that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Medlin v. SpazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Ergo v. Merced Falls Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Campbell v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dyke v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Richmond v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Gregoriev v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. De La Torre v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Los Angeles City High School District v. SchumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API