Maher v. Voss
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, Judge:
Two questions are presented: (1) was Mrs. Maher’s status that of an invitee or licensee; (2) does the complaint show any actionable negligence? The present motion may, of course, be granted only if it appears to a certainty that the plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim. Berghane v. Radio Corporation of America, (D. C.) 4 F. R. D. 446; 2 Moore’s Fed. Practice (2d. ed.) 2245.
No Delaware case has been brought to my attention wherein our Court has undertaken to define, in general terms, the distinction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Goldberg v. StrausSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Wool v. LarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Biggs v. BearAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Ashley v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Buchholz v. SteitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Wolfson v. ChelistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Walker v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.