Legal Opinion

Biggs v. Bear

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,317PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley

This is a personal injury action in which the court directed a verdict of not guilty and entered judgment thereon.

To test the court’s action we must assume plaintiff’s evidence to be true, favor her strongly in drawing legal inferences and consider then whether there is any evidence tending to prove the elements of her case. Under the issues plaintiff was required to prove that defendants violated a duty to warn her, their guest, of a dangerous arrangement of doors in their kitchen; and that while exercising due care and as a result of defendants’ failure to warn her, and their further…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Purtell v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Kapka v. UrbaszewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Tempest v. RichardsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API