Walker v. Williams
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Per curiam
-We granted certiorari, heard-argument and carefully considered the very comprehensive briefs' and supplemental briefs filed by both parties. No question of fact or law-,'which was not presented to the Court of Appeals, is'presented to ns. Cur conclusion, after hearing argument and studying the record, is that the Court of Appeals has fully answered all the questions presented and correctly decided-the case. What they say makes sense to us. To rewrite the opinion on the samé assignments would serve iio useful purpose and we, therefore, adopt the opinion of.the Court of Appeals as prepared for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Sanders v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Goldberg v. StrausSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Hudson v. GaitanTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Prater v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Ridley v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
- Anthony v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.