Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Darr

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 28, 1984No. 84-4172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

This is a legal malpractice action based on diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Plaintiff, a Kansas resident, contends that defendant, a Colorado resident, negligently failed to institute a lawsuit on his behalf. Plaintiff served the defendant by first class mail as provided by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(e)(2)(C)(ii). This matter is presently before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss or quash service of process.

The parties appear to agree that Kansas law does not allow service by mail under the circumstances of this case. The question presented here…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. William B. May Co. v. HyattDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. San Miguel & Compañia, Inc. v. International Harvester Export Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Datskow v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Datskow v. TeledyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Reno Distributors, Inc. v. West Texas Oil Field Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  4. A.I.M. International, Inc. v. Battenfeld Extrusions Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1987
  5. Richmond v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API