Legal Opinion
Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 1983No. 83 C 0332PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Petitioner Nora Chronister (“Chronister”) brought suit against Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc. (“STT”) for allegedly violating Missouri’s workmen’s compensation law and the public policy against retaliatory discharge. On or about April 16, 1982, while working as a truck driver for STT, Chronister was involved in an accident and sustained personal injuries. Chronister thereafter made claims for medical benefits and other compensation. In her complaint, she alleges that STT terminated her as a direct and proximate cause of her being injured on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Quann v. Whitegate-EdgewaterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- Epstein v. WilderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Reno Distributors, Inc. v. West Texas Oil Field Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- A.I.M. International, Inc. v. Battenfeld Extrusions Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1987
- Ackermann v. LevineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.