William B. May Co. v. Hyatt
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge
This action was commenced in this, the Southern District of New York. Before me is the motion of defendants David and Lillian Hyatt to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to quash service of process. The complaint alleges that defendants failed to pay a brokerage commission due plaintiff for the sale of defendants’ cooperative apartment. It was served by certified mail on defendants at their home in California. Plaintiff asserts that such service was valid pursuant to a newly enacted provision of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c) which permits service by mail in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merz v. HemmerleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
3Cited by21 opinions
- Datskow v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ziegler Bolt and Parts Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Akzona Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Datskow v. TeledyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Grosser v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.