Legal Opinion

Devis v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1998No. B108920PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

This case arises from appellant David Mejia Devis’s arrest and imprisonment after respondent Bank of America (Bank) erroneously informed police that he had stolen checks from respondent Patrick McKinney. Devis and his mother, appellant Margarita Devis, who was present when her son was arrested, sued McKinney and the Bank. The complaint attempted to avoid the bar of Civil Code 1 section 47, on privileged communications, by bringing a variety of causes of action, including one against the Bank for negligence in the investigation which led to the report to the police.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Williams v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Beroiz v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Dang v. EhredtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Sacramento Brewing Co. v. Desmond, Miller & DesmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API