Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Mandel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 1989No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 40, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Gary Steven Mandel, alleging violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The petition was based upon Mandel’s conviction on September 30, 1985 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland of four violations of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3) (obtaining a Schedule II, Narcotic Controlled Substance by furnishing false and forged prescriptions.) 1 We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rules BV16c and BV9b, to Judge Arrie W. Davis of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Matter of ClyneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. People v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. In re MandelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API