Legal Opinion
Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. v. Lieberman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 3, 1984No. Nos. 83-2938, 83-2976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals are from an order garnishing Gherman’s salary. In Case No. 83-2938, Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. (Gherman’s employer and the garnishee, hereafter FIP) contends that since, without dispute, no salary or other debt was due from it to Gherman1 at the *1023time of the service of the' writ of garnishment or any time between such service and the time of FIP’s answer, the trial court erred in ordering garnishment. We agree with this contention and reverse the order of garnishment.
Section 77.06, Florida Statutes (1979), limits the liability of a garnishee to those…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West Florida Grocery Co. v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Holden v. Estate of GardnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. HutchinsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Packard Motors Co. v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. v. LiebermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985