Legal Opinion · Dissent

Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. v. Lieberman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1985No. 85-326Published

1DissentHubbart, Judge

I must respectfully dissent. I would grant the appellant Financial & Investment Planning, Inc.’s [FIP] motion for rehearing, reverse the order denying FIP’s motion for attorney’s fees, and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to award FIP a reasonable attorney’s fee in this case.

The basic facts of this case are set forth in Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. v. Lieberman, 452 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), at a prior appearance of this same case before this court. In that case, we reversed an order of garnishment which had been entered by the trial court against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Financial & Investment Planning, Inc. v. LiebermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API