Legal Opinion

Midwest Security Life Insurance v. Stroup

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1999No. 06A05-9804-CV-201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, Midwest Security Life Insurance Company (Midwest), brings an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment as to the claim of Appellees, Theresa A. Stroup (Theresa) and Patrick J. Stroup (collectively the Stroups).

We reverse.

On appeal, Midwest presents the following issues:(1) Whether the Stroups’ common law claims against Midwest for breach of an insurance contract and the tort of bad faith are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); 1 and(2) Whether the Stroups are entitled to a trial by jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Midwest Security Life Insurance v. StroupIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Burgess v. E.L.C. Electric, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Darst v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Darst v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Midwest Security Life Insurance v. StroupIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API