Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Midwest Security Life Insurance v. Stroup

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2000No. 06S05-0006-CV-364Published

1ConcurrenceBoehm, Justice

I concur in the majority’s resolution of the ERISA preemption issue. I write separately because the ease may or may not be over, and the Court of Appeals expressed views with which I disagree as to the right to a jury trial in the courts of this state under Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution.

As the majority opinion observed, ERISA creates a federal statutory claim for recovery of “benefits due to [the beneficiary] under the terms of his plan, to enforce his rights under the terms of the plan, or to clarify his rights to future benefits under the terms of the plan.” Employee…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Brown v. GerdesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API