Legal Opinion
Boyd v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1987No. 84-1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a petition for review of an order of the District of Columbia Department of Human Services (the “agency”) which reduced by ten percent the rate of monthly payment petitioner was entitled to receive under a grant for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”), until a prior erroneous overpayment to her was recouped. Her contention is that this order was based on an agency policy or practice which was tantamount to a rule, and because such rule was adopted without compliance with the rulemaking requirements of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act; codified at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Junghans v. Department of Human Resources of District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- MCM Parking Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rorie v. District of Columbia Department of Human ResourcesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hamer v. Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Reichley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nwankwo v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Reichley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997