Legal Opinion
Reichley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 1987No. 85-253PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The Director of the Department of Employment Services (DOES) denied petitioner Reichley’s claim for supplemental workers compensation benefits because Reichley had received compensation for the same period of disability under Virginia’s compensation scheme. In doing so, the Director relied on his decision in Ringgold v. Safeway Stores, H & AS No. 83-157, OWC No. 15214 (Jan. 24,1985), which he decided after Reichley had filed claims in both the District of Columbia and Virginia. Ring-gold overruled the agency’s earlier decision in Herring v. Guest Services, Inc., H & AS…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mallof v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lenaerts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.