Legal Opinion

Reichley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1987No. 85-253Published

1Opinion of the Court

531 A.2d 244 (1987)

Samuel B. REICHLEY, Petitioner,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Intervenor.

No. 85-253.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued December 16, 1985.

Decided September 9, 1987.

Thomas J. Kelly, Jr., with whom Joseph H. Koonz, Jr., Roger C. Johnson, Carolyn McKenney, and Peter C. DePaolis, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner.

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Inez Smith Reid, Corp. Counsel at the time the briefs were filed, John H. Suda, Acting Corp. Counsel at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API