Yorgan v. Durkin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 53. {dissenting). Because the need for medical care arose out of the same accident as did the settlement proceeds and there is no evidence in the record that Sol Hernandez (Hernandez) provided Attorney Durkin (Durkin) any instructions about the disbursement of the settlement proceeds to Doctor Yorgan (Yorgan) that were contrary to the assignment she executed in favor of Yorgan, I conclude that Hernandez validly assigned to Yorgan settlement proceeds from her personal injury claim, up to the amount of the charges for the chiropractic treatments Yorgan provided to Hernandez. I also conclude…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Rock River Lumber Corp. v. Universal Mortgage Corp. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.