Legal Opinion
Maurice Mercantile Co. v. American Employers' Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 8, 1934No. Civ. No. 9144PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHMIDT, J., pro tem.
On February 7, 1927, Maurice Rosenthal, Inc. (assignor of respondent), entered into a lease of a store in Fresno for five years at a rental of $600 per month payable monthly in advance. Said lessee applied *356to appellant surety company to issue a $5,000 bond guaranteeing the lease, said lease requiring a surety company bond “as surety thereon in the penal sum of Five Thousand (5,000) Dollars for the faithful performance by the lessee, ... of all the terms, conditions and covenants in this lease provided by it to be performed, observed and kept”. Application to the surety…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ehrman v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- New Liverpool Etc. Co. v. Western Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cirimele v. ShinazyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Progressive Collection Bureau v. WhealtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Jacobson v. KingsberyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- LITON GEN. ENG'G CON., INC. v. United Pac. Ins.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Liton General Engineering Contractor, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993