Legal Opinion · Dissent

Liton General Engineering Contractor, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1993No. A053997Published

1Dissent

PETERSON, J.*

I respectfully dissent.

This case presents important issues of first impression in this state which affect all public (and ultimately private) works of improvement. It concerns the liability of a surety, issuing a public works payment bond, for a subcontractor’s attorney fees and costs incurred in recovering an award from the *595surety’s principal in a private and voluntary contractual arbitration, in which each party agreed, and was ordered, to pay its own such expenses, and to which the surety was not a party. It raises the issue of whether such private arbitration is an action “on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Post Bros. Construction Co. v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Boliver v. Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API