Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1976No. Civ. 38590PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVINE, J. *

This is an appeal from a judgment in an administrative mandamus proceeding under section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in which the trial judge, having exercised his independent judgment on the evidence, sustained a decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. By the board’s decision, which adopts the referee’s statement of facts and reasons for decision, appellant herein was held liable for overpayment of unemployment benefits in the amount of $835.

Appellant, a young lawyer, who had been employed by a law firm, was separated from his situation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gilles v. Department of Human Resources DevelopmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Moore v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Junious M.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. San Diego Union v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API