Legal Opinion

People v. Rojas

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1975No. Crim. 18552PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Abel Magleno Rojas and Arthur Nester Ramirez appeal from judgments upon jury convictions of assault with a deadly weapon in two counts as to each defendant (Pen. Code, § 245) and, as to Ramirez only, of use of a firearm in the commission of the assaults (Pen. Code, § 12022.5). Rojas alone contends that the court erred in denying his motion to enter a plea of once in jeopardy due to discharge of the jury upon its failure to reach a verdict in a prior trial. Both defendants urge prejudicial error when, because the prosecution’s chief witness who had been granted immunity…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Paulson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Alcala v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API