Legal Opinion

People v. GARDINEER

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2000No. C032812PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Defendant Michael Feeney Gardineer was sentenced to state prison after the trial court revoked his probation because he violated a domestic violence restraining order.

Defendant appeals, contending (1) the condition of probation that he violated, which required him to “observe good conduct,” is unconstitutionally vague; (2) there was insufficient evidence that he knew of the terms and conditions of the restraining order so that he could not have willfully violated it; and (3) the trial court unlawfully increased the amount of his restitution fine upon revocation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. TillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Josue S.California Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Justin S.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. People v. BrandãoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. HardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API