Legal Opinion

People v. Tillman

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2000No. S077360PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Two provisions of the Penal Code—sections 1202.4 and 1202.45 1 —require trial courts to impose a restitution fine as part of the judgment of conviction entered against a criminal defendant and, in cases where parole is granted, an additional fine in the same amount suspended unless parole is later revoked. The restitution fine under section 1202.4 is mandatory unless the sentencing court, in the words of the statute, “finds compelling and extraordinary reasons for not doing so, and- states those reasons on the record.” (§ 1202.4, subd. (b).) In cases in which the court imposes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API