Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Brandão

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2012No. H037871PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARQUEZ, J.

Defendant Antonio Brandáo pleaded no contest to possessing methamphetamine, a felony offense. Nothing in the record indicates that defendant has any gang affiliations or other gang-related history, nor did the underlying offense have anything to do with a gang. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred by imposing a no-gang-contact probation condition on him. We agree. We will modify the probation condition and, with that modification, affirm the judgment.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant pleaded no contest to violating subdivision (a) of Health and Safety Code section…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. Erica R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. In re Anthony S. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API