Legal Opinion

People v. Hard

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 2003No. A097349PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

Under Health and Safety Code section 11379.8, a defendant convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine “with respect to” a substance of a certain volume containing methamphetamine earns an enhanced penalty. In this case we consider whether a defendant arrested in the early stages of the manufacturing process is subject to this volume enhancement when he possesses more than three gallons of a solvent containing methamphetamine to be used in the final stage of the process to purify crystallized methamphetamine. Defendant argues that the volume enhancement applies only to a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Cory Mayer v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. In re White, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. State v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API