People v. Hard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
Under Health and Safety Code section 11379.8, a defendant convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine “with respect to” a substance of a certain volume containing methamphetamine earns an enhanced penalty. In this case we consider whether a defendant arrested in the early stages of the manufacturing process is subject to this volume enhancement when he possesses more than three gallons of a solvent containing methamphetamine to be used in the final stage of the process to purify crystallized methamphetamine. Defendant argues that the volume enhancement applies only to a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. LunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cory Mayer v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- In re White, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- State v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 2004