Legal Opinion
Younger v. Blanchard Hdwe. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 30, 1926No. 16766PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, O.
L. O. Blanchard, trading as the Blanchard Hardware Company, made an assignment to Cleat Peterson, H. L. Miller, and J. W. Brownlow, for the benefit of creditors, and they will hereinafter be designated as plaintiffs, and Monroe Younger and G. W. Knight will be designated as defendants.
In September, 1921, Blanchard filed an action in replevin against Monroe Younger to recover certain personal property, and Younger gave a redelivery bond, with G. W. Knight as surety. In December, 1923, Blanchard recovered judgment against Younger for the return of the property “in as good…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. HastySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Winn v. CoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Tulsa v. DicksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Shobe v. SykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930