Legal Opinion
Len-Ron Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 1, 2000No. Consol. 94-08-00488PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Len-Ron Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al., (Len-Ron) move for partial summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(a), contending they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the United States Customs Service (Customs) improperly classified the merchandise at issue under subheading 4202.92.45, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), as “Other ... With outer surface of sheeting of plastic ... Travel, sports and similar bags ... Other,” dutiable at a rate of 20% ad valorem. Plaintiffs argue the imported merchandise is classified…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Len-Ron Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Dolly, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.