Legal Opinion
Rafferty v. City of Covina
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1955No. Civ. 20930PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in certiorari annulling annexation proceedings of the city of Covina which were taken pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 (Gov. Code, §§ 35300-35326 and §§ 35000-35006), for brevity hereinafter called the act. The territory here involved is designated as Westerly Annexation District No. 18, hereinafter referred to as WAD 18.
Factual Background
On September 17, 1951, Ordinance No. 314 was passed by the city council of Covina annexing to the city under the act certain uninhabited territory. After two publications of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of Anaheim v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People ex rel. Cuff v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Fountain v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Henderson v. City of BloomingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. City of Garden GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Annexation of Lots 1 to to 37 to Flossmoor v. Mutual National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.