Legal Opinion

Astoria Plywood Co. v. Culp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1992No. 90-12785, 90-04277; CA A71622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*739DURHAM, J.

Employer appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board order affirming a permanent partial disability (PPD) award to claimant. Employer contends that the Board erred in applying pre-July 1, 1990, law to this case, because a hearing was not convened before that date, as required by Or Laws 1990 (Spec Sess), ch 2, § 54(2). Employer also contends that the Board’s conclusion that claimant’s back condition is compensable is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

On May 2, 1987, claimant compensably injured his knee. Employer accepted thé claim, which was closed by a January 11,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. City of Portland v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tattoo v. Barrett Business ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Astoria Plywood Co. v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Boeing Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Hill v. Trader JoesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Precision Castparts Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API