Legal Opinion

United States v. Hillsman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2007No. 06-20087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Defendant argues that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the district court responded to a jury note without first giving defense counsel an opportunity to object to the response. We affirm.

I

John Hillsman was indicted with three counts of possession of crack cocaine, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense, and felon in possession. He pleaded guilty to the last count, but denying possession of crack, demanded a jury trial on counts one and two.

He was convicted on both counts. The prosecution’s case turned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Musladin v. LamarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Francis Guerra PleitezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Bladimir MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API