United States v. Hillsman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Defendant argues that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the district court responded to a jury note without first giving defense counsel an opportunity to object to the response. We affirm.
I
John Hillsman was indicted with three counts of possession of crack cocaine, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense, and felon in possession. He pleaded guilty to the last count, but denying possession of crack, demanded a jury trial on counts one and two.
He was convicted on both counts. The prosecution’s case turned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Musladin v. LamarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Francis Guerra PleitezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Bladimir MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.