Legal Opinion

Musladin v. Lamarque

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 12, 2009No. 03-16653PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Mathew Guy Musladin appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In a prior decision, we reversed the district court on the ground that buttons depicting the victim worn by spectators at Musladin’s trial impermissi-bly conveyed to jurors the message that Musladin was guilty, and we declined to address Musladin’s other claims. Musladin v. Lamarque, 427 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 2005). Our decision was reversed by the Supreme Court. Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006). We consider the remaining issues in this…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. RoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Marvin Walker v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Janosky v. St. AmandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Brown v. HorellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API