Legal Opinion

United States v. Bladimir Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2017No. 15-50205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Bladimir Martinez appeals his conviction by jury trial and his sentence for being a removed alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. During its deliberations, the jury sent a note to the judge seeking guidance on the significance of a special finding as to Martinez’s removal date. The special finding had significance only with respect to the sentence imposed by the jury. Without responding in open court and without notifying or consulting counsel, the judge penned his own response on the note and returned it to the jury. Between the time…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. People v. MendiolaSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. United States v. Duane EhmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API