Legal Opinion

State v. Paulick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1967No. 40600PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This matter is before the court on a petition for a writ of prohibition alleging that the Municipal Court of Hennepin County does not have jurisdiction over defendant. It seeks to enjoin the prosecution of a traffic violation. The only issue is whether the execution of the complaint before a clerk of the court rather than a magistrate is a denial of defendant’s constitutional rights.

The charge against defendant is contained in the following amended complaint:

“STATE OF MINNESOTA

MUNICIPAL COURT

“COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
“AMENDED COMPLAINT
“Richard Lindgren, being duly sworn, makes…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shadwick v. City of TampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Daly v. PedersenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  4. People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API