Legal Opinion

Walter v. Valley Forge Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1987No. 659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this case an insured requested his broker to obtain an endorsement to his no-fault, automobile insurance policy which would reduce his premium by making his personal injury protection excess coverage over his private health care insurance. Several years after the endorsement had been issued, the insured’s daughter was rendered a quadriplegic as a result of an automobile accident. The insured commenced an action to compel the insurer to pay past and future medical bills even though the health care insurance had not been exhausted. The basis for the action was an averment that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Tonkovic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Klein v. RaysingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Framlau Corp. v. Delaware CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. MoessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Koval v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Alan R. v. Kemper National Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Banker v. Valley Forge InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Philmar Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. York Street Associates IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API