Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Peña
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. Nos. 93-1505, 93-2378, and 93-2712PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners, nine of the nation’s largest railroads accounting for ninety percent of the industry’s train operations, petition for review of the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) re-interpretation of the Hours of Service Act of 1907, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-66. The railroads challenge the FRA’s recent announcement that it was abandoning an established interpretation of the Act and would consider as time on duty that time spent waiting for transportation to a designated terminal by a train crew that has been relieved of all operating duties of the train to which it is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Moreno-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engi v. FRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- First Chicago Nbd Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.